<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 3G Summit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Petal vs Nikko by fernanda</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=645&#038;cpage=1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>fernanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=645#comment-15</guid>
		<description>i prefer to play grand theft auto IV, because i really like those racey violent games. In my opinion i think grand theft auto was made for a more mature audience and flower was made for all ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i prefer to play grand theft auto IV, because i really like those racey violent games. In my opinion i think grand theft auto was made for a more mature audience and flower was made for all ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jurnee Coleman by Mr. Pajakowski</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=256&#038;cpage=1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Pajakowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=256#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Nice avatar Jurnee! I can&#039;t wait to see the final projects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice avatar Jurnee! I can&#8217;t wait to see the final projects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Naijir by Mr. Pajakowski</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=430&#038;cpage=1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Pajakowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=430#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Is your avatar&#039;s name Alex? If so, why did you change your name?
Can&#039;t wait to see the final projects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your avatar&#8217;s name Alex? If so, why did you change your name?<br />
Can&#8217;t wait to see the final projects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Medill Reports Chicago: 3G Summit featured article by forex robot</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=482&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>forex robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=482#comment-10</guid>
		<description>found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Schedule of Events by Tweets that mention 3G Summit &#124;  Schedule of Events -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?page_id=53&#038;cpage=1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 3G Summit &#124;  Schedule of Events -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?page_id=53#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Katherine Mancuso, Bonnie Nardi. Bonnie Nardi said: http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?page_id=53 Games and Girls, check it out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Katherine Mancuso, Bonnie Nardi. Bonnie Nardi said: <a href="http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?page_id=53" rel="nofollow">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?page_id=53</a> Games and Girls, check it out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on objectification of genders by Anthony Lu</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=322&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=322#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Men tend to be objectified as aggressors but this is a form of objectification aimed toward men.  Women also objectify men but it is rarely seen in the media.  I&#039;ve only heard of it in conversations with females.

I feel your frustration on this matter.  I personally feel that games need a more diverse cast of characters.  The main characters in games are predominantly white males.  Other races are generally used as background characters and are relatively stereotypical.  Females are poorly represented as large breasted beauties and are rarely protagonists.  Games for children, until just recently, just had white characters or anthropomorphic characters.

These patterns make for repetitive themes and games.  I believe that games would connect with their audience better if they had a broader range.  You and I are evidence of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men tend to be objectified as aggressors but this is a form of objectification aimed toward men.  Women also objectify men but it is rarely seen in the media.  I&#8217;ve only heard of it in conversations with females.</p>
<p>I feel your frustration on this matter.  I personally feel that games need a more diverse cast of characters.  The main characters in games are predominantly white males.  Other races are generally used as background characters and are relatively stereotypical.  Females are poorly represented as large breasted beauties and are rarely protagonists.  Games for children, until just recently, just had white characters or anthropomorphic characters.</p>
<p>These patterns make for repetitive themes and games.  I believe that games would connect with their audience better if they had a broader range.  You and I are evidence of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on objectification of genders by Meg</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=322&#038;cpage=1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=322#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I would find games full of nothing but attractive cardboard-cutout characters boring.  On the other hand, it would suggest that producers knew women played their games.

I don&#039;t think we do have objectified men, though.  Normally when people talk about &quot;objectified&quot; men they bring up Gods of War or something, but in those instances men aren&#039;t sexualized or objectified the way women are.  They are designed, still, for men to look at.  Actually objectified men tend to make straight men uncomfortable, and we know how liberal the male gaming audience is.

If we had men who looked like Johnny Weir, who had to get naked to activate their special powers, who&#039;s packages received long, lingering looks from the camera ala Mass Effect 2, we might be able to consider whether, given our patriarchal society, those rare messages were equivalent to the objectification of women, and whether we&#039;d prefer characters of both genders who were people first and sexually desirable second, or not at all.  I doubt we will ever have to answer that question, however. 

Have you seen Deadwood?  I want to play a game as Calamity Jane from Deadwood, but I know I never will because she&#039;s not appealing to the gamer audience.  That&#039;s what makes me sad about sexualized women, not that they exist but that they are the only women who are considered protagonist-material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would find games full of nothing but attractive cardboard-cutout characters boring.  On the other hand, it would suggest that producers knew women played their games.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we do have objectified men, though.  Normally when people talk about &#8220;objectified&#8221; men they bring up Gods of War or something, but in those instances men aren&#8217;t sexualized or objectified the way women are.  They are designed, still, for men to look at.  Actually objectified men tend to make straight men uncomfortable, and we know how liberal the male gaming audience is.</p>
<p>If we had men who looked like Johnny Weir, who had to get naked to activate their special powers, who&#8217;s packages received long, lingering looks from the camera ala Mass Effect 2, we might be able to consider whether, given our patriarchal society, those rare messages were equivalent to the objectification of women, and whether we&#8217;d prefer characters of both genders who were people first and sexually desirable second, or not at all.  I doubt we will ever have to answer that question, however. </p>
<p>Have you seen Deadwood?  I want to play a game as Calamity Jane from Deadwood, but I know I never will because she&#8217;s not appealing to the gamer audience.  That&#8217;s what makes me sad about sexualized women, not that they exist but that they are the only women who are considered protagonist-material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey Baby, check out this post! by JP Sherman</title>
		<link>http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>JP Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imamp.colum.edu/3gsummit/?p=45#comment-6</guid>
		<description>As long as I don&#039;t think of this as a &quot;game&quot; I&#039;m actually pretty ok with it as a way to communicate frustration, experience events in another person&#039;s shoes, vent some harmless frustration and make it a way to start a conversation. 

As a game, it&#039;s one dimensional... however, if that aspect of the game was intentional, it kind of shows the one dimensional way women are often viewed by those who throw cat-calls. 

I guess, for me, it&#039;s an interactive statement simulation, not a game... not offensive, and like most good art, causes me to think differently about situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as I don&#8217;t think of this as a &#8220;game&#8221; I&#8217;m actually pretty ok with it as a way to communicate frustration, experience events in another person&#8217;s shoes, vent some harmless frustration and make it a way to start a conversation. </p>
<p>As a game, it&#8217;s one dimensional&#8230; however, if that aspect of the game was intentional, it kind of shows the one dimensional way women are often viewed by those who throw cat-calls. </p>
<p>I guess, for me, it&#8217;s an interactive statement simulation, not a game&#8230; not offensive, and like most good art, causes me to think differently about situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
